
MTF
What is the first thing you look for in a photograph? Is it the colour quality, brightness or the sharpness that you focus on?
Everyone loves a good sharp image. If the image does well in that perspective, only then people love to admire the colour combination and other features.
The sharpness of a photographic imaging system or any component of this system such as lens, sensor etc is characterized by a parameter called MTF [Modulation Transfer Function].
Learned opticians love to call it the spatial frequency response but we would like to keep it simple and easy to understand.There are thousands of formulae and many complicated MATLAB functions that help us to understand the complete phenomenon but we’ll generalize the understanding part.
The MTF factor needs to be compared when you buy a new digital camera.
As a layman, how do you know whether MTF50 or MTF50P is better as a comparison parameter?
All latest cameras have the ability to sharpen the image to some extent. Sharpening an image surely increases its contrast at the boundaries by reducing the rise distance. In such cases, the edges overshoot thus enhancing the perception of sharpness. But a large overshoot can create ugly halos near the boundary section which become obvious at high magnifications.
Such a mistake can destroy the sharpness and quality of the image completely.Every digital camera will have MTF50 and MTF50P specifications. While MTF50 corresponds to the frequency band where MTF becomes 50% of its low frequency, MTF50P implies to 50% of its peak values. These 2 indicators greatly determine the perceived sharpness.
Along with increase in sharpness, noise also increases.Suppose a digital camera sharpens an image which increases 50% MTF frequency. If the camera does over-sharpening, we may have an image with good MTF50 but very poor image quality; whereas a low sharpening will show the low potential of a camera. Either ways, MTF50 comparisons fail to help in picking the right camera.Moving on to the MTF50P factor, we see that MTF50P is same as MTF for a moderate level of sharpening. The MTF50P falls if we go for over sharpening.
Hence this is better as compared to the MTF50.The MTF factors come into picture only when a high degree of sharpened image needs to be evaluated. Otherwise, Standardized sharpening and Raw MTF50 without standardized sharpening are better comparison attributes for images.
MTF50P is one of the best features to compare while going for over sharpening of images.As discussed earlier, small overshoots across the edges give a good overall sharp image. Suppose you are going for a customized camera, then you need to keep the lens features in mind.While comparing the lens performance for the same camera, uncorrected MTF50 is one of the best parameters to compare. Sometimes people tend to confuse the term of ‘sharpening’ with "Unsharp masking’.
You must be remembering the old films and the way the slides for the film were prepared. The process of ‘unsharp masking’ reduced the overall contrast of the image which is needed for a better print version and increased the contrast near the edges rather than at a distance from the edges.Thus unsharp masking Is a bit tedious and cumbersome too.
In a nutshell, we have discussed as to how MTF factor can be used to compare the features and picture quality of cameras and how does the sharpening process depend so much on MTF



16 comments:
I like the overall photo. Maybe because i like looking at wide horizons and great scenery.
Actually, sharpness isn't essential for me if it creates an effect that enhances the image but where it's required it makes the photo. My first reaction is always, always, always to the color palette, then compostion and editing in equal portions. Thanks for the breakdown on MTF, you're a peach. And nice job on the play on words, unless you weren't thinking of WTF and then, I don'tknow what I'm talking about anyway...
Love your photographs. I use Minolta for film and didigtal cameras, like Sony and Canon. Not sure it is so much the camera that makes a photo an art or the photographer. nice equipment never hearths... I think I do ok with the equipment I have Photography Art.
Ayie, thank you for your commenting. Really appreciating your words
PJ, you are spot on in the colour accuracy and reproduction. There are many emphasises on various styles of photograph. The modern day emphasis tends to be MTF because it can be measured. Hence the hot topics in the field of consumer field of camera business.
Personally, I write these articles to help myself to be familiar with these concepts. Ultimately, photography is the art :)
Artprints, thanks for your time to visit my blog. Minolta is a great brand and it makes sense that you follow the legacy by acquiring Sony in the end. Canon has been behind in its lens innovation and cmos sensor technology lately.
It is a super sharp image. Only a Canon 50mm f1.2L can produce such a stunning image.
With my camera I can't take this into consideration, but it's an excellent lesson for me in the future when I can move up to a much better camera.
Thank you for the visiting. Great to see you two here :)
Before I read your article of MTF, I noticed your picture was extremely clear. Thank you for the education. I am not familiar with MTF. I wish I could afford a f/1.2 L-lens. :) Do you have the f/1.8 or f/1.4 version which are more affordable?
Karen, f1.8 version is more affordable and sharper than f1.4 version at f1.8 aperture.
Interestingly, both lenses are flimsily built.
You're right. If a photo isn't sharp, there's not point to it.
Interesting technical commentary. I've got the new Nikon D f1.8 50 mm which is fine for my purposes...I see there's a new one out now for $500 street...I'll pass...
You really have some interesting ideas. I never really thought about anything but clicking the shutter before!
Hi from SpeedyCat ;-)
I can see I will learn a lot from you! A great blog! Thanks for the lesson....and the visit.
For me the positioning of the elements on the photograph is most important- you have to let people think when they look at your photo- although the color and sharpness is also important because it is those elements that attracts the attention in the first place.
Like the photo above the pole is more to the right hand side, if it was smack bang in the middle it would have looked very wrong- but with it on the side it attracts your attention and then guides your eyes to the landscape and only then you view the photo as a whole
Great site!
Hi Roen, Got your message from Blog Catalog. Im here to stumble your site. You have a great site.
Karl Zada of www.beautyinpageants.blogspot.com and www.sietecontrados.blogspot.com
Post a Comment